I have a 1964 roller in great shape and was thinking about doing a coyote swap.
However has anyone tried to fit a coyote in one of these yet?
I know they are wide
Also thought of a 4.6/older 5.0
Trying to keep it a ford engine.
Any ideas or info would great thanks!
1964 engine swap ideas
Moderator: redstangbob
Re: 1964 engine swap ideas
Godzilla engine.
1) It’s a Ford
2) It’s big enough to move a T-bird, more displacement than a coyote, 445 glorious cubic inches
3) it is a center cam so it is narrow enough to fit between the inner fenders
https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6007-73
A junkyard version would probably be cheaper. You will need the ECU, a transmission, and a fuel system and fabricate a bunch of stuff, but it will be very cool
1) It’s a Ford
2) It’s big enough to move a T-bird, more displacement than a coyote, 445 glorious cubic inches
3) it is a center cam so it is narrow enough to fit between the inner fenders
https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6007-73
A junkyard version would probably be cheaper. You will need the ECU, a transmission, and a fuel system and fabricate a bunch of stuff, but it will be very cool
1966 Thunderbird Convertible (Emberglo / White-Emberglo)
Modified 428 - stroked, rollercam, aluminum top end, headers
Livermore, CA
Modified 428 - stroked, rollercam, aluminum top end, headers
Livermore, CA
Re: 1964 engine swap ideas
Godzilla engine.
1) It’s a Ford
2) It’s big enough to move a T-bird, more displacement than a coyote, 445 glorious cubic inches
3) it is a center cam so it is narrow enough to fit between the inner fenders
https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6007-73
A junkyard version would probably be cheaper. You will need the ECU, a transmission, and a fuel system and fabricate a bunch of stuff, but it will be very cool
1) It’s a Ford
2) It’s big enough to move a T-bird, more displacement than a coyote, 445 glorious cubic inches
3) it is a center cam so it is narrow enough to fit between the inner fenders
https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6007-73
A junkyard version would probably be cheaper. You will need the ECU, a transmission, and a fuel system and fabricate a bunch of stuff, but it will be very cool
1966 Thunderbird Convertible (Emberglo / White-Emberglo)
Modified 428 - stroked, rollercam, aluminum top end, headers
Livermore, CA
Modified 428 - stroked, rollercam, aluminum top end, headers
Livermore, CA
Re: 1964 engine swap ideas
Hey thanks! And I didn't even think about the new 7.3s being center cam!