4.6 in a 64

This area is for posting questions/information concerning 1964-66 year Thunderbirds NO FOR SALE POSTINGS

Moderator: redstangbob

Post Reply
stubbie
Posts: 800
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:23 pm

4.6 in a 64

Post by stubbie »

User avatar
Privateer
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 5:50 pm
Location: Salt Lake City

Re: 4.6 in a 64

Post by Privateer »

Looks like they used the front cradle assembly from the donor car and mated it to the existing shock towers/frame. I was hoping to see the use of the whole frame brought over and adapted when I saw the omission of the upper strut bars. I have a 2004 Mercury Marquis that gets around okay, I wonder how the 190hp Modular motor drives in that car.
User avatar
sseebart
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:45 am
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Re: 4.6 in a 64

Post by sseebart »

Privateer wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 7:51 am Looks like they used the front cradle assembly from the donor car and mated it to the existing shock towers/frame. I was hoping to see the use of the whole frame brought over and adapted when I saw the omission of the upper strut bars. I have a 2004 Mercury Marquis that gets around okay, I wonder how the 190hp Modular motor drives in that car.
If they're going flat out in this short video, then I'm thinking it's pretty sluggish: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_oZPNH ... e=youtu.be

Probably the first gauge replacement I've seen that I actually like. Overall, the car looks a little hastily done: uneven upholstery stitching, lots of rust on the new motor and questionable modifications to the body (see that sheet metal bolted on to cover a hole under the hood hinges? Squicky.)

Still, full credit for actually completing the project. Last attempt I saw here was Hitman's 64, which appeared to peter out a couple of years ago: https://www.vintagethunderbirdclub.net/ ... 25&t=13636

Took me a while to find the photos. Link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_oZPNH ... e=youtu.be

~Steve
stubbie
Posts: 800
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: 4.6 in a 64

Post by stubbie »

Someone needs to go and test drive and report back. I'd do it but it's a bit far for me.
jtschug
Posts: 1484
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 1:33 pm

Re: 4.6 in a 64

Post by jtschug »

An easy fix to the sluggishness would be replace the Mod-motor with a Coyote. Now that the mod is in there, it should just bolt in.
1966 Thunderbird Convertible (Emberglo / White-Emberglo)
Modified 428 - stroked, rollercam, aluminum top end, headers
Livermore, CA
mitch0537
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2020 11:35 pm

Re: 4.6 in a 64

Post by mitch0537 »

There are a lot of old police cruisers at auction that you could use as a donor car. Might be good to have the wiring harness, computer and other things rather than buy them separately.
jtschug
Posts: 1484
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 1:33 pm

Re: 4.6 in a 64

Post by jtschug »

I withdraw my suggestion of a Coyote. Ford is now offering a Godzilla crate engine.

https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/c ... asic-mods/

Here is the catalog listing:
https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6007-73
1966 Thunderbird Convertible (Emberglo / White-Emberglo)
Modified 428 - stroked, rollercam, aluminum top end, headers
Livermore, CA
Post Reply