Coil over rear shocks

This area is for posting questions/information concerning 1955-57 year Thunderbirds NO FOR SALE POSTINGS

Moderator: Joe Johnston

Post Reply
Posts: 304
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 6:30 pm
Location: Houston, Tx.

Coil over rear shocks

Post by goldwinghg »

Has anybody,installed coil over rear shocks,on there 56 tbird. If so,how was the ride? Does it cause the rear to sit high.
Paul T. Amick
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:45 pm

Re: Coil over rear shocks

Post by Paul T. Amick »

Hi, In 1956 the TBirds came with a spring OE in the bottom of the shock. That doesn't do a thing for ride height. If your talking about an overload style spring, well that's just what it is "overload". If you need them it's spring time, and I don't mean the season. Non original you could go with an air shock. Good luck.
ICON 1956
Posts: 1214
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:11 am
Location: Mokena, Illinois

Re: Coil over rear shocks

Post by ICON 1956 »

I have air shocks on my 56 rear end, my car sits 24". which is the suggested height. I feel that the coil over shocks would bring the rear end higher. This would spoil the esthetics of the car.
1956 Thunderbird Sage Green
1997 Heritage Springer with Motorvation matching side Car Red/Birch White
VTCI Member # 12309
User avatar
Posts: 1419
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 12:23 am
Location: Northeastern New Jersey

Re: Coil over rear shocks

Post by paul2748 »

Coil over shocks are usually adjustable for ride height. There should be an adjustment ring on the shock. If you have good springs, a coil over shock should not be needed.

A true coil over shock actually replaces both the spring and the old shock. This is one variation
coil over.jpg
1956 Fiesta Red 312
1954 Ford Victoria 312
1948 Ford Convertible Street Rod 302
Post Reply