56 M code vs P code

This area is for posting questions/information concerning 1955-57 year Thunderbirds NO FOR SALE POSTINGS

Moderator: Joe Johnston

Post Reply
User avatar
Haz567
Posts: 260
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:40 pm
Location: Kentucky

56 M code vs P code

Post by Haz567 »

What is the % of 56's that were built as M Code?
David Tulowitzky
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:09 pm

Re: 56 M code vs P code

Post by David Tulowitzky »

For the 1956 model year I have 5,294 Thunderbirds in my database. Of these 400 are the "M" code. This comes to approximately 9.25%

Dave Tulowitzky
Keeper of 55-57 Thunderbird Registry
User avatar
Haz567
Posts: 260
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:40 pm
Location: Kentucky

Re: 56 M code vs P code

Post by Haz567 »

David Tulowitzky wrote: Sat Jan 18, 2020 3:59 am For the 1956 model year I have 5,294 Thunderbirds in my database. Of these 400 are the "M" code. This comes to approximately 9.25%
Thanks David, thought it may be you with an answer! I get 7.6% when I divide 400 by 5,294, could it have been 490 M codes?

Also, all M Codes built w/ standard 3 speed trans (no O/D)?
David Tulowitzky
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:09 pm

Re: 56 M code vs P code

Post by David Tulowitzky »

You are correct, I thought the 9.25 % sounded high. Yes all "M" codes were 3 speed no overdrive.
User avatar
Haz567
Posts: 260
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:40 pm
Location: Kentucky

Re: 56 M code vs P code

Post by Haz567 »

Thank you David! Having you as a resource is great!
Jim G
Posts: 84
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2020 1:25 am

Re: 56 M code vs P code

Post by Jim G »

Speaking of Data Base— If I send you or who- my soon to purchase ‘56 Vin # can I find out a history of owners of this TBird? Or is there a Title search history I can go through at Department of Motor Vehicles somewhere? JG
Post Reply