C6 into 62 (revisited)

This area is for posting questions/information concerning 1961-63 year Thunderbirds NO FOR SALE POSTINGS

Moderator: Wklink

Post Reply
stevegintn
Posts: 753
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:33 pm

C6 into 62 (revisited)

Post by stevegintn »

There's an interesting post here from a couple years ago about putting a C6 into a 62 (Graeme 'ozbird' et al.)

To follow up, I have a chance to get a C6 very reasonable, so was thinking about replacing the COM in my stock 62.

Is that a good idea?

If so, how big a job is it?

Will it require 'shift kits' or new mounts/braces?

Will my dual exhaust headers be in the way?

Just testing the waters (I am NOT a transmission guy, so all will be hired work).
Steve G.
'62 TBird HT
'61 TBird HT (parts car)
'88 Ranger XLT
'02 Sportrac 4x4
2012 Dodge RAM 4x4
'49 Ford 8N
stubbie
Posts: 800
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:23 pm

Re: C6 into 62 (revisited)

Post by stubbie »

From what I can remember you have to do some mods to the mount as the C6 mounting position sits further back. There should be other posts on the topic. I'm sure I've seen pictures of the mod.
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=6912&start=15
User avatar
RedBird64
Posts: 2234
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:42 pm
Location: Bothell Wa.

Re: C6 into 62 (revisited)

Post by RedBird64 »

Not sure what the advantage would be in the end. They're both 3 speeds and the COM is a stout trans and functions super nice after a rebuild with updates.
Since it isn't a simple bolt-in mod it will be a lot of work and some fabrication for little in return.

JMHO,

Scott
1964 Coupe Wimbledon white/Rangoon Red w/black int. Owned for 42 years. It was my folks car before that (second owners). VTCI # 12013.
stevegintn
Posts: 753
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:33 pm

Re: C6 into 62 (revisited)

Post by stevegintn »

RedBird64 wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2019 6:12 pm Not sure what the advantage would be in the end. They're both 3 speeds and the COM is a stout trans and functions super nice after a rebuild with updates.
Since it isn't a simple bolt-in mod it will be a lot of work and some fabrication for little in return.

JMHO,

Scott
Thank you, Scott - then I won't worry about it (I thought the C6 was maybe a 4 speed?)
Steve G.
'62 TBird HT
'61 TBird HT (parts car)
'88 Ranger XLT
'02 Sportrac 4x4
2012 Dodge RAM 4x4
'49 Ford 8N
User avatar
truesteve
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 4:39 pm
Location: Spokane WA

Re: C6 into 62 (revisited)

Post by truesteve »

The difference is parts availability. With the c6 you can get all the performance goodies and any tranny shop to work on it. Not so with the COM. The shift kits that were once available for the COM are rare, and shops are shy about working on them. If you have a rebuilt COM and don't need any extra performance, then stick it in and enjoy. I have a performance built c6 and plan (?) To do the mods for a swap. It shouldn't take more than a weekend or 104.
FORD 61 bulletbird white/green Resto mod project
FORD 63 bulletbird white/red - parts for sale
FORD 85 F350 4x4 Diesel Turbo Dually/Crew
FORD 76 F250 4x4 highboy
FORD 48 8N Tractor work horse
User avatar
RedBird64
Posts: 2234
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:42 pm
Location: Bothell Wa.

Re: C6 into 62 (revisited)

Post by RedBird64 »

stevegintn wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2019 12:37 pm
RedBird64 wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2019 6:12 pm Not sure what the advantage would be in the end. They're both 3 speeds and the COM is a stout trans and functions super nice after a rebuild with updates.
Since it isn't a simple bolt-in mod it will be a lot of work and some fabrication for little in return.

JMHO,

Scott
Thank you, Scott - then I won't worry about it (I thought the C6 was maybe a 4 speed?)
No, I wish they were 4 speeds!
FWIW, I just checked a couple of sources and shift kits are readily available from Transtar along with all the wear items.
Some of the more unusual parts, like drums, are harder to find but they aren't normal wear items and wont get replaced unless something very unusual has happened.

Even without a shift kit, the COM is a fine transmission and will work like it did off the show room floor with a simple rebuild kit (avail from several vendors).

A C6 can be built stronger so if you have a ton of HP and want it for all out performance purposes (or something like a manual valve body). For a strong DD, the COM is great.
A C6 that's heavily built (and thus, shifts harshly) would be my choice if an aftermarket OD was added.

S
1964 Coupe Wimbledon white/Rangoon Red w/black int. Owned for 42 years. It was my folks car before that (second owners). VTCI # 12013.
stevegintn
Posts: 753
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:33 pm

Re: C6 into 62 (revisited)

Post by stevegintn »

OK, so what does that 'shift kit' do for you?
Steve G.
'62 TBird HT
'61 TBird HT (parts car)
'88 Ranger XLT
'02 Sportrac 4x4
2012 Dodge RAM 4x4
'49 Ford 8N
User avatar
RedBird64
Posts: 2234
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:42 pm
Location: Bothell Wa.

Re: C6 into 62 (revisited)

Post by RedBird64 »

stevegintn wrote: Sun Aug 04, 2019 10:03 am OK, so what does that 'shift kit' do for you?
It firms up the shifts a little to save on clutches/bands and gives it a slightly better shift "logic". IIRC, it increases pressures under certain circumstances.
The trans feels more "crisp" - if that makes sense. The difference is very subtle though.
1964 Coupe Wimbledon white/Rangoon Red w/black int. Owned for 42 years. It was my folks car before that (second owners). VTCI # 12013.
stevegintn
Posts: 753
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:33 pm

Re: C6 into 62 (revisited)

Post by stevegintn »

RedBird64 wrote: Fri Aug 16, 2019 2:00 pm
It firms up the shifts a little to save on clutches/bands and gives it a slightly better shift "logic". IIRC, it increases pressures under certain circumstances.
The trans feels more "crisp" - if that makes sense. The difference is very subtle though.
OK, thanks again, Scott - sounds like some thing to look into? Are the kits expensive?
Steve G.
'62 TBird HT
'61 TBird HT (parts car)
'88 Ranger XLT
'02 Sportrac 4x4
2012 Dodge RAM 4x4
'49 Ford 8N
User avatar
RedBird64
Posts: 2234
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:42 pm
Location: Bothell Wa.

Re: C6 into 62 (revisited)

Post by RedBird64 »

stevegintn wrote: Sat Aug 17, 2019 9:24 am
RedBird64 wrote: Fri Aug 16, 2019 2:00 pm
It firms up the shifts a little to save on clutches/bands and gives it a slightly better shift "logic". IIRC, it increases pressures under certain circumstances.
The trans feels more "crisp" - if that makes sense. The difference is very subtle though.
OK, thanks again, Scott - sounds like some thing to look into? Are the kits expensive?
No, they're very inexpensive because there isn't much to them.

S
1964 Coupe Wimbledon white/Rangoon Red w/black int. Owned for 42 years. It was my folks car before that (second owners). VTCI # 12013.
stevegintn
Posts: 753
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:33 pm

Re: C6 into 62 (revisited)

Post by stevegintn »

OK, great - is it something external (bolt on), or do you have to crack the case?
Steve G.
'62 TBird HT
'61 TBird HT (parts car)
'88 Ranger XLT
'02 Sportrac 4x4
2012 Dodge RAM 4x4
'49 Ford 8N
User avatar
RedBird64
Posts: 2234
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:42 pm
Location: Bothell Wa.

Re: C6 into 62 (revisited)

Post by RedBird64 »

stevegintn wrote: Tue Aug 20, 2019 11:19 am OK, great - is it something external (bolt on), or do you have to crack the case?
It replaces several parts in the valve body and may include drilling passages.
I will dive into most projects but I will never again try to install a shift kit (mans got to know his limitations...)
The one time I tried, it was nearly disasterous. :drinking:

Scott
1964 Coupe Wimbledon white/Rangoon Red w/black int. Owned for 42 years. It was my folks car before that (second owners). VTCI # 12013.
Post Reply