Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

This area is for posting questions/information concerning 1964-66 year Thunderbirds NO FOR SALE POSTINGS

Moderator: redstangbob

Post Reply
abaucom
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2014 3:47 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by abaucom »

Question to anyone who has changed their bias-ply tires to radials: Currently my 1966 has factory correct red-band white wall tires but these tires at least 11 years old, only a few thousand miles used. Your opinion if I should replace these bias-ply tires with radials? Is it going to make that much of difference on how the auto drives / handles if I only drive about 1,000 miles yearly on summer dry roads?

FYI, my 1966 currently at a restoration garage, front & rear suspension parts now in excellent condition. Sad but true since I received delivery of the 1966 in Nov., only drove the auto about 200 yards at low speed from the transport truck to my garage, my garage onto a flat bed truck. So I have no clue how it handles on the open road. My directive to the restoration garage is that I want a smooth driving and safe auto at 65 MPH.

Thoughts and suggestions would be helpful regarding if I should replace the old (11 years) but seldom used factory correct bias-ply tires with reproduction radial tires.
Image
Image
T-Bird Registry #19119
1966 T-Bird convertible
2011 Camaro 2LT
User avatar
Alan H. Tast
Posts: 4243
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 10:52 pm
Location: Omaha, NE

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by Alan H. Tast »

If you can find a set of correct rims and put radials on them, consider having a second set so that you can cruise around without worry. Currently manufacturers and our 'nanny state' say replace if more than 6-8 years old for reasons I won't go into. Save the bias-ply WSW/Red stripe tires and keep on rims so you can swap them out for display or concours-type events, or sell the tires to someone who's looking for a set for show.

So that you know where I'm coming from, I have a set of WSW bias-ply Goodyear tires for my '63 HT that I got 11 years ago and only put a few thousand miles on them. I dismounted them thinking I would put them on a set of wire wheels for show, but still haven't remounted them. I have radials on the car now that were purchased 10 years ago for a cross-country drive to the VTCI International in Portland, OR in 2005, where the car took Best of Show-Driven. I will probably change these out should I consider resuming driving the car more than from my home to the local cruise night.
Alan H. Tast, AIA
Technical Director/Past President,
Vintage Thunderbird Club Int'l.
Author, "Thunderbird 1955-1966" & "Thunderbird 50 Years"
1963 Hardtop & 1963 Sports Roadster
abaucom
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2014 3:47 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by abaucom »

Thanks for you input.
Yes, current tires might be 11-12 years old, and factory correct bias-ply reproductions, only used for 1,000 -1,300 miles during the last decade and look factory new. Since I will only drive this auto about max 1,200 miles per year, mostly on city streets, think it will be a waste of money to replace tires at this time. There will be times when I open it up and drive 65 MPH.
When new this 1966 could run smoothly at 85 MPH with little effort on the factory bias-ply tires. Have to admit back in the day I drove my Dads 1966 more than once at 85 mph +.
T-Bird Registry #19119
1966 T-Bird convertible
2011 Camaro 2LT
Peddller
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 10:26 pm
Location: Bel Air, MD

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by Peddller »

I have the reproduction bias ply tires on my 65, they were on it when I bought the car. As I thought I might show this car I stuck with them. My 64 had radials on it when I got it (it was my first "old car") it drove so much better then my 65 does that I am really thinking of getting another set of wheels and mounting radials. The handling is so much better that even though I only drive the car about 500 miles per year I think it would be worth it.
Bill Clark
Bel Air, Maryland
1957 F code
2005 50th anniversary
1963 Avanti R2
1956 GMC Suburban Carrier pickup
1966 Corvair Corsa Turbo
Prior Birds
1963 M code SR
1964 Convertable
1965 convertible
User avatar
Tbird100636
Posts: 443
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:25 am
Location: Braintree, Massachusetts

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by Tbird100636 »

A company called Diamond Back makes/alters tires to resemble the original White and Red wall bias tires, but are modern radials. They make many other variations of striped tires in a variety of sizes. Give them a look: http://www.dbtires.com/index.html
1964 Thunderbird Hardtop- 390 FE 4V- Chantilly Beige- NEVER done, but beautiful as is.
1966 Thunderbird Convertible- 390 FE 4V- Red (Originally Wimbledon White)- Hood installed and repaint coming... well... not sure when...
User avatar
Richard
Posts: 592
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:51 am
Location: Long Island New York

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by Richard »

Put radial tires on for sure..I had the Coker bias ply white with red band on my 65 when I got her..They looked like they were in nice shape but decided to put radials on. The car starts better,handles better and stops better..The difference like they say is like night and day!! Also if tires are as old as yours it is recommened to change no matter what kind of tires you have..Be safe and change them..Good luck..
1965 Hardtop Charcoal Gray Metallic
VTCI#12157
BrianC
Posts: 600
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 12:56 am
Location: South Jersey, East of Philly

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by BrianC »

First, drive it with the bias tires for a bit (you need a reference point to compare, since you haven't driven the car much)....then put radials on...you won't go back.
'66 Ragtop, 77k miles. Antique bronze. Brought from original owner. Fully documented.
User avatar
Richard
Posts: 592
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:51 am
Location: Long Island New York

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by Richard »

That's good advice BrianC...
1965 Hardtop Charcoal Gray Metallic
VTCI#12157
kevindeluca66
Posts: 764
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:41 pm
Location: Minooka Il

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by kevindeluca66 »

Take a good look at the current tires for hairline cracks in the sidewalls and in between the grooves of the thread. If the cracks are thinner that a hair I say keep driving. The whole reason the tire companies want you to change them is to keep them in the classic tire bussiness (not too much demand for whitwall tires for todays modern works of plastic) (AKA cars).The tires on my 66 are at least 13 years old and I dont have any plans to chang e them.
A 66 Thunderbird is cool. A Sapphire Blue 66 is a beautiful car. The 428 engine completes the package.
VTCI#10019 Member since 2002, parents have been members since I was 11 years old.
Royce Richmond
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 6:22 pm

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by Royce Richmond »

I have the same tires you have and the only thing different from radials is the bias plys tend to get caught up in irregularities in the road. Meaning that road cracks tend to redirect the car so you need to be alert. Having said that, I am not afraid to take my 66 on the texas toll road at the legal limit of 80mph. Happy T-Birding!
abaucom
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2014 3:47 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by abaucom »

Wonderful info. Guess it is best just to use the current bias-ply tires and see how it tracks as I do not expect to drive the 1966 more than 1000 miles during the coming summer.
Told the restoration garage, want a smooth riding auto this coming April. Told them I want the car to have correct tire/wheel balance and run smooth at 60-85 mph. Will wait to see how they balance the current tires.

Thanks so much for info from others on this thread. Result, if the car tracks and runs smooth this April with current factory stock bias-ply reproduction tires, then I will wait another year to replace tires as I will only be driving the auto to local auto shows.
T-Bird Registry #19119
1966 T-Bird convertible
2011 Camaro 2LT
User avatar
tb65m66
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:24 am
Location: Cibolo, TX

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by tb65m66 »

If you are going to run tires that are that old, be very careful about your speed. When we bought the'71 Ranchero, it had tires of unknown vintage. When the rear tire blew at 70 it was quite a ride. I'd keep it to in-town speeds only if using old tires.
Branch
65 Convert.
wayne63011
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 2:06 pm

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by wayne63011 »

Three years ago we put a set of the Diamond Back Dunlap radials on our '65 convertible. They have the correct width white wall with the red band and do look like the tires that were available on T'birds in 1965. We've now put nearly 15,000 miles on these tires with no issues at all. The Dunlap tire seemed to be the brand they were using at the time, but they also told me they would be glad to use whatever brand I wanted.
One note of caution: The front end alignment for these cars with bias-ply tires is different than what's recommended when you have radial tires. Therefore, if you elect to have one set of wheels/tires for critical shows/judging and another set for enjoyable driving, you will have to decide how you want the front end aligned as I'm sure you won't want to be changing it back and forth.
tbird
Posts: 2586
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 11:07 pm
Location: Tyndall MB. Canada

Re: Bias-ply vs Radial replacement tires.

Post by tbird »

The logics would be to do the recommend alignment for the radial driving tires, don't think that the front end being a few degrees off will mater on the show field.
Jim Mills
VTCI # 8071
VTCI 1964-66 Technical Editor
2002 Thunderbird
1965 Convertible
1962 Convertible (in progress)
1959 Ford Retractable HT
Many parts cars
Post Reply